lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 11 Feb 2021 01:42:07 +0200
From:   Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>
To:     "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@...nel.org>
Cc:     Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
        Ricardo Ribalda <ribalda@...omium.org>,
        Tomasz Figa <tfiga@...omium.org>, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2][next] media: uvcvideo: Remove duplicate assignments
 to pointer dma_dev

Hi Gustavo,

Thank you for the patch.

On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 03:01:49PM -0600, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> Remove redundant assignments to pointer dma_dev.
> 
> Fixes: fdcd02a641e2 ("media: uvcvideo: Use dma_alloc_noncontiguos API")
> Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1501703 ("Evaluation order violation")
> Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1501692 ("Evaluation order violation")
> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@...nel.org>

Colin King has already submitted the same patch ("[PATCH][next][V2]
media: uvcvideo: remove duplicated dma_dev assignments"). As they're
identical, I can only decide to use the first patch that reached my
mailbox.

> ---
> Changes in v2:
>  - Remove another redundant assignment in function
>    uvc_free_urb_buffers().
> 
>  drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_video.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_video.c b/drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_video.c
> index dc81f9a86eca..6f2f308d86fe 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_video.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_video.c
> @@ -1105,7 +1105,7 @@ static inline struct device *stream_to_dmadev(struct uvc_streaming *stream)
>  
>  static void uvc_urb_dma_sync(struct uvc_urb *uvc_urb, bool for_device)
>  {
> -	struct device *dma_dev = dma_dev = stream_to_dmadev(uvc_urb->stream);
> +	struct device *dma_dev = stream_to_dmadev(uvc_urb->stream);
>  
>  	if (for_device) {
>  		dma_sync_sgtable_for_device(dma_dev, uvc_urb->sgt,
> @@ -1586,7 +1586,7 @@ static void uvc_video_complete(struct urb *urb)
>   */
>  static void uvc_free_urb_buffers(struct uvc_streaming *stream)
>  {
> -	struct device *dma_dev = dma_dev = stream_to_dmadev(stream);
> +	struct device *dma_dev = stream_to_dmadev(stream);
>  	struct uvc_urb *uvc_urb;
>  
>  	for_each_uvc_urb(uvc_urb, stream) {

-- 
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ