[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210210071251.44084-1-linmiaohe@huawei.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2021 02:12:51 -0500
From: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@...wei.com>
To: <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>
CC: <linux-mm@...ck.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linmiaohe@...wei.com>
Subject: [PATCH] mm/hugetlb: optimize the surplus state transfer code in move_hugetlb_state()
We should not transfer the per-node surplus state when we do not cross the
node in order to save some cpu cycles
Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@...wei.com>
---
mm/hugetlb.c | 6 ++++++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
diff --git a/mm/hugetlb.c b/mm/hugetlb.c
index da347047ea10..4f2c92ddbca4 100644
--- a/mm/hugetlb.c
+++ b/mm/hugetlb.c
@@ -5632,6 +5632,12 @@ void move_hugetlb_state(struct page *oldpage, struct page *newpage, int reason)
SetHPageTemporary(oldpage);
ClearHPageTemporary(newpage);
+ /*
+ * There is no need to transfer the per-node surplus state
+ * when we do not cross the node.
+ */
+ if (new_nid == old_nid)
+ return;
spin_lock(&hugetlb_lock);
if (h->surplus_huge_pages_node[old_nid]) {
h->surplus_huge_pages_node[old_nid]--;
--
2.19.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists