[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <E4E1860E-57B8-44AA-B370-9589F9C20215@infradead.org>
Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2021 08:01:30 +0000
From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
To: Yang Song <songyang@...ux.alibaba.com>, dhowells@...hat.com,
keyrings@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
CC: zhang.jia@...ux.alibaba.com, tianjia.zhang@...ux.alibaba.com,
songyang@...ux.alibaba.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sign-file: add openssl engine support
On 10 February 2021 07:45:54 GMT, Yang Song <songyang@...ux.alibaba.com> wrote:
>Use a customized signature service supported by openssl engine
>to sign the kernel module.
>Add command line parameters that support engine for sign-file
>to use the customized openssl engine service to sign kernel modules.
>
>Signed-off-by: Yang Song <songyang@...ux.alibaba.com>
Aren't engines already obsolete in the latest versions of OpenSSL, as well as being an implementation detail of one particular crypto library? They aren't really a concept we should be exposing in *our* user interface.
Better to make sign-file automatically recognise RFC7512 PKCS#11 URIs and handle them by automatically loading the PKCS#11 engine.
--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists