linux-kernel - [PATCH] staging: wimax: Fix some coding style problems

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 11 Feb 2021 22:43:20 +0530
From:   Hemansh Agnihotri <hemanshagnihotri27@...il.com>
To:     gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, lee.jones@...aro.org,
        johannes@...solutions.net, kuba@...nel.org, arnd@...db.de,
        mail@...rudhrb.com
Cc:     devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] staging: wimax: Fix some coding style problems

This fixes checkpatch errors :- "else should follow close brace '}'",
"space required before the open parenthesis '('" and "spaces required
around that '?' (ctx:VxW)" in drivers/staging/wimax/i2400m/rx.c file.

Signed-off-by: Hemansh Agnihotri <hemanshagnihotri27@...il.com>
---
 drivers/staging/wimax/i2400m/rx.c | 11 +++++------
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/wimax/i2400m/rx.c b/drivers/staging/wimax/i2400m/rx.c
index 5b3a85035f6a..8ea0bd039ed7 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/wimax/i2400m/rx.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/wimax/i2400m/rx.c
@@ -485,8 +485,7 @@ struct i2400m_roq_data {
  * store the sequence number (sn) and the cs (packet type) coming from
  * the RX payload header from the device.
  */
-struct i2400m_roq
-{
+struct i2400m_roq {
 	unsigned ws;
 	struct sk_buff_head queue;
 	struct i2400m_roq_log *log;
@@ -556,7 +555,7 @@ void i2400m_roq_log_entry_print(struct i2400m *i2400m, unsigned index,
 {
 	struct device *dev = i2400m_dev(i2400m);
 
-	switch(e->type) {
+	switch (e->type) {
 	case I2400M_RO_TYPE_RESET:
 		dev_err(dev, "q#%d reset           ws %u cnt %u sn %u/%u"
 			" - new nws %u\n",
@@ -1046,7 +1045,7 @@ void i2400m_rx_edata(struct i2400m *i2400m, struct sk_buff *skb_rx,
 			 ro_type, ro_cin, roq->ws, ro_sn,
 			 __i2400m_roq_nsn(roq, ro_sn), size);
 		d_dump(2, dev, payload, size);
-		switch(ro_type) {
+		switch (ro_type) {
 		case I2400M_RO_TYPE_RESET:
 			i2400m_roq_reset(i2400m, roq);
 			kfree_skb(skb);	/* no data here */
@@ -1346,7 +1345,7 @@ int i2400m_rx_setup(struct i2400m *i2400m)
 {
 	int result = 0;
 
-	i2400m->rx_reorder = i2400m_rx_reorder_disabled? 0 : 1;
+	i2400m->rx_reorder = i2400m_rx_reorder_disabled ? 0 : 1;
 	if (i2400m->rx_reorder) {
 		unsigned itr;
 		struct i2400m_roq_log *rd;
@@ -1365,7 +1364,7 @@ int i2400m_rx_setup(struct i2400m *i2400m)
 			goto error_roq_log_alloc;
 		}
 
-		for(itr = 0; itr < I2400M_RO_CIN + 1; itr++) {
+		for (itr = 0; itr < I2400M_RO_CIN + 1; itr++) {
 			__i2400m_roq_init(&i2400m->rx_roq[itr]);
 			i2400m->rx_roq[itr].log = &rd[itr];
 		}
-- 
2.30.0