[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <DM5PR12MB183546B682C54B570213E8EADA8C9@DM5PR12MB1835.namprd12.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2021 19:42:50 +0000
From: Gustavo Pimentel <Gustavo.Pimentel@...opsys.com>
To: Krzysztof Wilczyński <kw@...ux.com>
CC: "dmaengine@...r.kernel.org" <dmaengine@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v5 04/15] PCI: Add pci_find_vsec_capability() to find a
specific VSEC
On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 12:50:46, Krzysztof Wilczyński <kw@...ux.com>
wrote:
> Hi Gustavo,
>
> [...]
> > + * Typically this function will be called by the pci driver, which passes
>
> It would be "PCI" here.
Nicely catch.
>
> > + * through argument the 'struct pci_dev *' already pointing for the device
> > + * config space that is associated with the vendor and device ID which will
> > + * know which ID to search and what to do with it, however, it might be
>
> Probably "there might be".
I've rephrased it.
>
> > + * cases that this function could be called outside of this scope and
> > + * therefore is the caller responsibility to check the vendor and/or
> [...]
>
> A suggestion. This commit message is a little hard to read and could be
> improved.
>
> It might just be me (by and large, and I am not a native English
> speaker), but it's actually easier to figure out what the function does
> after reading the implementation that from the comment. :)
I have also rephrased it. I hope it would be better, but I don't see how.
"Adds another helper to ones that already exist called
pci_find_vsec_capability. This helper crawls through the device PCI
config space searching for a specific ID on the Vendor-Specific Extended
Capabilities section.
The Vendor-Specific Extended Capability (VSEC) is a special PCI
capability (acts like container) defined by PCI-SIG that allows the one
or more proprietary capabilities defined by the vendor which aren't
standard or shared between the manufactures.
-Gustavo
>
> Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists