lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 11 Feb 2021 13:59:35 +0100
From:   Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To:     Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>,
        Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>
Cc:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Chris Zankel <chris@...kel.net>,
        Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@...il.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-mips@...r.kernel.org, linux-xtensa@...ux-xtensa.org,
        Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>,
        Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
        Ben Gardon <bgardon@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] locking/arch: Move qrwlock.h include after qspinlock.h

On 10/02/21 17:19, Thomas Bogendoerfer wrote:
>>   arch/arm64/include/asm/spinlock.h  | 2 +-
>>   arch/mips/include/asm/spinlock.h   | 2 +-
>>   arch/xtensa/include/asm/spinlock.h | 2 +-
>>   3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> which tree should this go through ? I can take it via mips-next,
> if everybody agrees.

The breakage is in the KVM tree, and the existing patch has acked-by 
from the locking primitives folks.  So I'll queue it there in order to 
limit the range that breaks bisection.

Paolo

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ