linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/3] Use clocks property in a device node

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 11 Feb 2021 15:38:41 +0000
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     Sameer Pujar <spujar@...dia.com>, thierry.reding@...il.com,
        robh@...nel.org
Cc:     devicetree@...r.kernel.org, sharadg@...dia.com,
        alsa-devel@...a-project.org, linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org,
        kuninori.morimoto.gx@...esas.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        jonathanh@...dia.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Use clocks property in a device node

On Wed, 10 Feb 2021 12:13:38 +0530, Sameer Pujar wrote:
> It is recommended to not specifiy clocks property in an endpoint subnode.
> This series moves clocks to device node.
> 
> However after moving the clocks to device node, the audio playback or
> capture fails. The specified clock is not actually getting enabled and
> hence the failure is seen. There seems to be a bug in simple-card-utils.c
> where clock handle is not assigned when parsing clocks from device node.
> 
> [...]

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/3] ASoC: simple-card-utils: Fix device module clock
      commit: 1e30f642cf2939bbdac82ea0dd3071232670b5ab
[2/3] Revert "ASoC: audio-graph-card: Add clocks property to endpoint node"
      commit: 0be0f142b8323378df6358c36dd15494134f5b94
[3/3] arm64: tegra: Move clocks from RT5658 endpoint to device node
      (no commit info)

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark