linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] vdpa/mlx5: fix param validation in mlx5_vdpa_get

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20210211153900.tzmyxw5wlxxk7vbl@steredhat>
Date:   Thu, 11 Feb 2021 16:39:00 +0100
From:   Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@...hat.com>
To:     "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
Cc:     Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>, Eli Cohen <elic@...dia.com>,
        virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
        Parav Pandit <parav@...dia.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] vdpa/mlx5: fix param validation in mlx5_vdpa_get_config()

On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 07:12:31AM -0500, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 12:17:19PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
>>
>> On 2021/2/9 下午5:00, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
>> > On Tue, Feb 09, 2021 at 07:43:02AM +0200, Eli Cohen wrote:
>> > > On Mon, Feb 08, 2021 at 05:17:41PM +0100, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
>> > > > It's legal to have 'offset + len' equal to
>> > > > sizeof(struct virtio_net_config), since 'ndev->config' is a
>> > > > 'struct virtio_net_config', so we can safely copy its content under
>> > > > this condition.
>> > > >
>> > > > Fixes: 1a86b377aa21 ("vdpa/mlx5: Add VDPA driver for supported
>> > > > mlx5 devices")
>> > > > Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
>> > > > Signed-off-by: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@...hat.com>
>> > >
>> > > Acked-by: Eli Cohen <elic@...dia.com>
>> > >
>> > > BTW, same error in vdpa_sim you may want to fix.
>> > >
>> >
>> > Commit 65b709586e22 ("vdpa_sim: add get_config callback in
>> > vdpasim_dev_attr") unintentionally solved it.
>> >
>> > Since it's a simulator, maybe we can avoid solving it in the stable
>> > branches. Or does it matter?
>>
>>
>> I think not, since the module depends on RUNTIME_TESTING_MENU.
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>
>Well people use the simulator for development...
>I'm not going to block this patch on it, but if someone
>has the cycles to post a stable branch patch, that would be
>great.
>

Okay, I'll do it.

Thanks,
Stefano