[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <11aff288-feaa-8e43-fcda-12bc12fbf4cf@linux.microsoft.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2021 10:27:56 -0800
From: Lakshmi Ramasubramanian <nramas@...ux.microsoft.com>
To: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc: Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@...ux.ibm.com>,
Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.ibm.com>,
"AKASHI, Takahiro" <takahiro.akashi@...aro.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>,
vincenzo.frascino@....com, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
dmitry.kasatkin@...il.com, James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
"Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>,
Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@...een.com>,
Allison Randal <allison@...utok.net>,
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>,
Matthias Brugger <mbrugger@...e.com>,
Hsin-Yi Wang <hsinyi@...omium.org>, tao.li@...o.com,
Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@....fr>,
Prakhar Srivastava <prsriva@...ux.microsoft.com>,
balajib@...ux.microsoft.com, linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v17 02/10] of: Add a common kexec FDT setup function
On 2/12/21 10:24 AM, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 11:19 AM Lakshmi Ramasubramanian
> <nramas@...ux.microsoft.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 2/12/21 6:38 AM, Rob Herring wrote:
>>> On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 7:17 PM Lakshmi Ramasubramanian
>>> <nramas@...ux.microsoft.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 2/11/21 5:09 PM, Thiago Jung Bauermann wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> There's actually a complication that I just noticed and needs to be
>>>>> addressed. More below.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> <...>
>>>>
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +/*
>>>>>> + * of_kexec_alloc_and_setup_fdt - Alloc and setup a new Flattened Device Tree
>>>>>> + *
>>>>>> + * @image: kexec image being loaded.
>>>>>> + * @initrd_load_addr: Address where the next initrd will be loaded.
>>>>>> + * @initrd_len: Size of the next initrd, or 0 if there will be none.
>>>>>> + * @cmdline: Command line for the next kernel, or NULL if there will
>>>>>> + * be none.
>>>>>> + *
>>>>>> + * Return: fdt on success, or NULL errno on error.
>>>>>> + */
>>>>>> +void *of_kexec_alloc_and_setup_fdt(const struct kimage *image,
>>>>>> + unsigned long initrd_load_addr,
>>>>>> + unsigned long initrd_len,
>>>>>> + const char *cmdline)
>>>>>> +{
>>>>>> + void *fdt;
>>>>>> + int ret, chosen_node;
>>>>>> + const void *prop;
>>>>>> + unsigned long fdt_size;
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> + fdt_size = fdt_totalsize(initial_boot_params) +
>>>>>> + (cmdline ? strlen(cmdline) : 0) +
>>>>>> + FDT_EXTRA_SPACE;
>>>>>
>>>>> Just adding 4 KB to initial_boot_params won't be enough for crash
>>>>> kernels on ppc64. The current powerpc code doubles the size of
>>>>> initial_boot_params (which is normally larger than 4 KB) and even that
>>>>> isn't enough. A patch was added to powerpc/next today which uses a more
>>>>> precise (but arch-specific) formula:
>>>>>
>>>>> https://lore.kernel.org/linuxppc-dev/161243826811.119001.14083048209224609814.stgit@hbathini/
>>>>>
>>>>> So I believe we need a hook here where architectures can provide their
>>>>> own specific calculation for the size of the fdt. Perhaps a weakly
>>>>> defined function providing a default implementation which an
>>>>> arch-specific file can override (a la arch_kexec_kernel_image_load())?
>>>>>
>>>>> Then the powerpc specific hook would be the kexec_fdt_totalsize_ppc64()
>>>>> function from the patch I linked above.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Do you think it'd better to add "fdt_size" parameter to
>>>> of_kexec_alloc_and_setup_fdt() so that the caller can provide the
>>>> desired FDT buffer size?
>>>
>>> Yes, I guess so. But please define the param as extra size, not total
>>> size. The kernel command line size addition can be in the common code.
>>
>> Will do. Just to clarify -
>>
>> The common code will do:
>>
>> fdt_totalsize(initial_boot_params) + strlen(cmdline) + extra_fdt_size
>>
>> The caller will pass "extra_fdt_size"
>> ARM64 => 4KB
>> PPC64 => fdt_totalsize(initial_boot_params) - which will be updated when
>> the patch Thiago had referred to is merged.
>
> Yes, I'd leave the 4KB in there by default and arm64 use 0.
>
Sounds good.
common:
fdt_totalsize(initial_boot_params) + strlen(cmdline) + 0x1000 + extra
arm64 => 0 for extra
ppc => fdt_totalsize(initial_boot_params) for extra.
-lakshmi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists