[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87im6xulc4.fsf@manicouagan.localdomain>
Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2021 16:39:39 -0300
From: Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Lakshmi Ramasubramanian <nramas@...ux.microsoft.com>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.ibm.com>,
"AKASHI, Takahiro" <takahiro.akashi@...aro.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>,
vincenzo.frascino@....com, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
dmitry.kasatkin@...il.com, James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
"Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>,
Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@...een.com>,
Allison Randal <allison@...utok.net>,
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>,
Matthias Brugger <mbrugger@...e.com>,
Hsin-Yi Wang <hsinyi@...omium.org>, tao.li@...o.com,
Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@....fr>,
Prakhar Srivastava <prsriva@...ux.microsoft.com>,
balajib@...ux.microsoft.com, linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v17 02/10] of: Add a common kexec FDT setup function
Lakshmi Ramasubramanian <nramas@...ux.microsoft.com> writes:
> On 2/12/21 10:24 AM, Rob Herring wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 11:19 AM Lakshmi Ramasubramanian
>> <nramas@...ux.microsoft.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 2/12/21 6:38 AM, Rob Herring wrote:
>>>> On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 7:17 PM Lakshmi Ramasubramanian
>>>> <nramas@...ux.microsoft.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> On 2/11/21 5:09 PM, Thiago Jung Bauermann wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> There's actually a complication that I just noticed and needs to be
>>>>>> addressed. More below.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> <...>
>>>>>
>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>> +/*
>>>>>>> + * of_kexec_alloc_and_setup_fdt - Alloc and setup a new Flattened Device Tree
>>>>>>> + *
>>>>>>> + * @image: kexec image being loaded.
>>>>>>> + * @initrd_load_addr: Address where the next initrd will be loaded.
>>>>>>> + * @initrd_len: Size of the next initrd, or 0 if there will be none.
>>>>>>> + * @cmdline: Command line for the next kernel, or NULL if there will
>>>>>>> + * be none.
>>>>>>> + *
>>>>>>> + * Return: fdt on success, or NULL errno on error.
>>>>>>> + */
>>>>>>> +void *of_kexec_alloc_and_setup_fdt(const struct kimage *image,
>>>>>>> + unsigned long initrd_load_addr,
>>>>>>> + unsigned long initrd_len,
>>>>>>> + const char *cmdline)
>>>>>>> +{
>>>>>>> + void *fdt;
>>>>>>> + int ret, chosen_node;
>>>>>>> + const void *prop;
>>>>>>> + unsigned long fdt_size;
>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>> + fdt_size = fdt_totalsize(initial_boot_params) +
>>>>>>> + (cmdline ? strlen(cmdline) : 0) +
>>>>>>> + FDT_EXTRA_SPACE;
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Just adding 4 KB to initial_boot_params won't be enough for crash
>>>>>> kernels on ppc64. The current powerpc code doubles the size of
>>>>>> initial_boot_params (which is normally larger than 4 KB) and even that
>>>>>> isn't enough. A patch was added to powerpc/next today which uses a more
>>>>>> precise (but arch-specific) formula:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://lore.kernel.org/linuxppc-dev/161243826811.119001.14083048209224609814.stgit@hbathini/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So I believe we need a hook here where architectures can provide their
>>>>>> own specific calculation for the size of the fdt. Perhaps a weakly
>>>>>> defined function providing a default implementation which an
>>>>>> arch-specific file can override (a la arch_kexec_kernel_image_load())?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Then the powerpc specific hook would be the kexec_fdt_totalsize_ppc64()
>>>>>> function from the patch I linked above.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Do you think it'd better to add "fdt_size" parameter to
>>>>> of_kexec_alloc_and_setup_fdt() so that the caller can provide the
>>>>> desired FDT buffer size?
>>>>
>>>> Yes, I guess so. But please define the param as extra size, not total
>>>> size. The kernel command line size addition can be in the common code.
>>>
>>> Will do. Just to clarify -
>>>
>>> The common code will do:
>>>
>>> fdt_totalsize(initial_boot_params) + strlen(cmdline) + extra_fdt_size
>>>
>>> The caller will pass "extra_fdt_size"
>>> ARM64 => 4KB
>>> PPC64 => fdt_totalsize(initial_boot_params) - which will be updated when
>>> the patch Thiago had referred to is merged.
>> Yes, I'd leave the 4KB in there by default and arm64 use 0.
>>
>
> Sounds good.
>
> common:
> fdt_totalsize(initial_boot_params) + strlen(cmdline) + 0x1000 + extra
>
> arm64 => 0 for extra
> ppc => fdt_totalsize(initial_boot_params) for extra.
Looks good to me.
--
Thiago Jung Bauermann
IBM Linux Technology Center
Powered by blists - more mailing lists