[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210213090618.GC4330@alpha.franken.de>
Date: Sat, 13 Feb 2021 10:06:18 +0100
From: Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>
To: linux-mips@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] MIPS: Simplify EVA cache handling
On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 05:16:14PM +0100, Thomas Bogendoerfer wrote:
> protected_cache_op is only used for flushing user addresses, so
> we only need to define protected_cache_op different in EVA mode and
> be done with it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>
> ---
> arch/mips/include/asm/r4kcache.h | 67 ++++++--------------------------
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 56 deletions(-)
applied to mips-next.
Thomas.
--
Crap can work. Given enough thrust pigs will fly, but it's not necessarily a
good idea. [ RFC1925, 2.3 ]
Powered by blists - more mailing lists