[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <16140f5b-c504-1c07-9f0c-3813d686d157@redhat.com>
Date: Sat, 13 Feb 2021 16:59:35 +0100
From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
Matti Vaittinen <matti.vaittinen@...rohmeurope.com>,
mazziesaccount@...il.com
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@...sung.com>,
Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>,
Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.com>,
Mark Gross <mgross@...ux.intel.com>,
Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org>,
Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ux-watchdog.org>,
Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com>,
Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org, platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/7] drivers: base: Add resource managed version of
delayed work init
Hi,
On 2/13/21 4:27 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 2/13/21 7:03 AM, Hans de Goede wrote:
> [ ... ]
>>
>> I think something like this should work:
>>
>> static int devm_delayed_work_autocancel(struct device *dev, struct delayed_work *w,
>> void (*worker)(struct work_struct *work)) {
>> INIT_DELAYED_WORK(w, worker);
>> return devm_add_action(dev, (void (*action)(void *))cancel_delayed_work_sync, w);
>> }
>>
>> I'm not sure about the cast, that may need something like this instead:
>>
>> typedef void (*devm_action_func)(void *);
>>
>> static int devm_delayed_work_autocancel(struct device *dev, struct delayed_work *w,
>> void (*worker)(struct work_struct *work)) {
>> INIT_DELAYED_WORK(w, worker);
>> return devm_add_action(dev, (devm_action_func)cancel_delayed_work_sync, w);
>
> Unfortunately, you can not type cast function pointers in C. It is against the C ABI.
> I am sure it is done in a few places in the kernel anyway, but those are wrong.
I see, bummer.
> This is the reason why many calls to devm_add_action() point to functions such as
>
> static void visconti_clk_disable_unprepare(void *data)
> {
> clk_disable_unprepare(data);
> }
>
> which could otherwise be handled using typecasts.
Hmm, wouldn't something like this be a candidate for adding a:
devm_clk_prepare_enable() helper?
This seems better then having the driver(s) make + error check separate
clk_prepare_enable() + devm_add_action_or_reset() calls ?
I must admit I'm guilty myself of just using devm_add_action() sometimes
when a specific devm helper is missing, but this whole discussion makes
me think that it would be good to have some extra devm helpers for
common cases / driver cleanup patterns.
If we add a devm_clk_prepare_enable() helper that should probably be added
to drivers/clk/clk-devres.c and not to drivers/base/devres.c .
I also still wonder if we cannot find a better place for this new
devm_delayed_work_autocancel() helper but nothing comes to mind.
Regards,
Hans
Powered by blists - more mailing lists