linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH net-next v2] misc: Add Renesas Synchronization Management Unit (SMU) support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sat, 13 Feb 2021 09:28:04 +0100
From:   Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Min Li <min.li.xe@...esas.com>
Cc:     "derek.kiernan@...inx.com" <derek.kiernan@...inx.com>,
        "dragan.cvetic@...inx.com" <dragan.cvetic@...inx.com>,
        "arnd@...db.de" <arnd@...db.de>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2] misc: Add Renesas Synchronization Management
 Unit (SMU) support

On Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 07:06:17PM +0000, Min Li wrote:
> > 
> > On Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 03:44:52PM +0000, Min Li wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > -set combomode
> > > > > -get dpll's state
> > > > > -get dpll's ffo
> > > > >
> > > > > This driver must work with Renesas MFD driver to access SMU
> > > > > through I2C/SPI.
> > > > >
> > > > > Changes since v1:
> > > > > -Provide more background for purpose of the change.
> > > > > -Provide compat_ioctl support
> > > > > -Fix ioctl cmd definition
> > > >
> > > > This "changes" list goes below the --- line.
> > > >
> > >
> > > Sorry, is this a problem that you are requesting me to address? I am bit
> > confused...
> > 
> > Yes, please place that list of changes below the --- line in your patch.
> > The documentation says to do this, right?
> > 
> Hi Greg
> 
> Do you mean this "---" like below? How can I do that? Sorry I was never asked to do that from other reviewer.

Yes, that line.

The documentation should tell you how to do that, as per my patch bot:

- This looks like a new version of a previously submitted patch, but you
  did not list below the --- line any changes from the previous version.
  Please read the section entitled "The canonical patch format" in the
  kernel file, Documentation/SubmittingPatches for what needs to be done
  here to properly describe this.

thanks,

greg k-h