linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] lkdtm: don't move ctors to .rodata

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sun, 14 Feb 2021 12:41:07 -0800
From:   Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] lkdtm: don't move ctors to .rodata

Quoting Greg Kroah-Hartman (2021-02-14 09:16:29)
> On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 10:53:10AM -0800, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > 
> > Sorry for the confusion. Can commit 655389666643 ("vmlinux.lds.h: Create
> > section for protection against instrumentation") and commit 3f618ab33234
> > ("lkdtm: don't move ctors to .rodata") be backported to 5.4.y and only
> > commit 3f618ab3323407ee4c6a6734a37eb6e9663ebfb9 be backported to 5.10.y?
> 
> 655389666643 ("vmlinux.lds.h: Create section for protection against
> instrumentation") does not apply cleanly to 5.4.y, so can you provide a
> working backport for both of those patches to 5.4.y that you have
> tested?
> 

Ok, will do.