[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210215092915.7khog24shtzjzd6g@kozik-lap>
Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2021 10:29:15 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>
Cc: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
Peter Meerwald-Stadler <pmeerw@...erw.net>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: iio: samsung,exynos-adc: add common clock
properties
On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 10:01:48AM +0100, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
> Hi Krzysztof,
>
> On 12.02.2021 17:38, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > Add common properties appearing in DTSes (assigned-clocks and similar)
> > to fix dtbs_check warnings like:
> >
> > arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos3250-artik5-eval.dt.yaml:
> > adc@...c0000: assigned-clock-rates: [[6000000]] is not of type 'object'
> > arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos3250-artik5-eval.dt.yaml:
> > adc@...c0000: assigned-clocks: [[7, 238]] is not of type 'object'
>
> Does it mean that assigned-clocks related properties have to be added to
> almost all bindings?
To my understanding: yes, and we already added it to multiple schemas.
> IMHO this is an over-engineering and this has to be
> handled somewhere else...
Would have to be made a part of the core schema (just like pinctrl nodes
etc).
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists