linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH net v1 1/3] net: phy: mscc: adding LCPLL reset to VSC8514

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 15 Feb 2021 09:15:41 +0000
From:   <Bjarni.Jonasson@...rochip.com>
To:     <andrew@...n.ch>
CC:     <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com>,
        <Steen.Hegelund@...rochip.com>, <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        <f.fainelli@...il.com>, <kuba@...nel.org>,
        <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <vladimir.oltean@....com>,
        <davem@...emloft.net>, <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
        <atenart@...nel.org>, <ioana.ciornei@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v1 1/3] net: phy: mscc: adding LCPLL reset to VSC8514

On Fri, 2021-02-12 at 16:20 +0100, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you
> know the content is safe
> 
> On Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 03:06:41PM +0100, Bjarni Jonasson wrote:
> > +static u32 vsc85xx_csr_read(struct phy_device *phydev,
> > +                         enum csr_target target, u32 reg);
> > +static int vsc85xx_csr_write(struct phy_device *phydev,
> > +                          enum csr_target target, u32 reg, u32
> > val);
> > +
> 
> Hi Bjarni
> 
> No forward definitions please. Move the code around so they are not
> required. Sometimes it is best to do such a move as a preparation
> patch.

Sure, I will remove them.

> 
> > @@ -1569,8 +1664,16 @@ static int vsc8514_config_pre_init(struct
> > phy_device *phydev)
> >               {0x16b2, 0x00007000},
> >               {0x16b4, 0x00000814},
> >       };
> > +     struct device *dev = &phydev->mdio.dev;
> >       unsigned int i;
> >       u16 reg;
> > +     int ret;
> 
> Hard to say from the limited context, but is reverse christmass tree
> being preserved here?

I will dobbelcheck.

> 
>       Andrew