linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 25/25] arm64: apple: Add initial Mac Mini 2020 (M1) devicetree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20210216073120.qmlaky43t6uelqc4@kozik-lap>
Date:   Tue, 16 Feb 2021 08:31:20 +0100
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To:     Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
Cc:     Hector Martin <marcan@...can.st>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>,
        Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
        Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@...all.nl>,
        Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
        Mohamed Mediouni <mohamed.mediouni@...amail.com>,
        Stan Skowronek <stan@...ellium.com>,
        Alexander Graf <graf@...zon.com>,
        Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 25/25] arm64: apple: Add initial Mac Mini 2020 (M1)
 devicetree

On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 01:00:58PM -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On 2/15/21 11:29 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> >> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/apple/apple-j274.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/apple/apple-j274.dts
> >> new file mode 100644
> >> index 000000000000..9a1be91a2cf0
> >> --- /dev/null
> >> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/apple/apple-j274.dts
> >> @@ -0,0 +1,41 @@
> >> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+ OR MIT
> > () around licenses, so:
> > (GPL-2.0+ OR MIT)
> 
> Hi,
> When/where does that "() around licenses" apply, please?

Hmm, somehow this pattern got into me but now I checked on the spdx.dev
and the preferred syntax is indeed without (). Skip this comment then.

Best regards,
Krzysztof