[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK8P3a3rGurSQBubZ8i4+OHpDgM8mOfXiC6UhDYmL0MSQK4BRA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2021 10:41:11 +0100
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>
To: Hector Martin <marcan@...can.st>
Cc: Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@...all.nl>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
Mohamed Mediouni <mohamed.mediouni@...amail.com>,
Stan Skowronek <stan@...ellium.com>,
Alexander Graf <graf@...zon.com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
DTML <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 14/25] dt-bindings: interrupt-controller: Add DT
bindings for apple-aic
On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 1:17 PM Hector Martin <marcan@...can.st> wrote:
> +
> + The 2nd cell contains the interrupt number.
> + - HW IRQs: interrupt number
> + - FIQs:
> + - 0: physical HV timer
> + - 1: virtual HV timer
> + - 2: physical guest timer
> + - 3: virtual guest timer
I wonder if you could just model the FIQ as a single shared level interrupt
(which is essentially what it is), and have every driver that uses it do a
request_irq() on the same IRQ number.
This would avoid having to come up with a fake binding for it, and simplify
the implementation that then no longer has to peek into each interrupt
source.
Arnd
Powered by blists - more mailing lists