[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <bba8e6790f4fc24fc2e9ecaa5d9eeabe@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2021 11:45:09 +0000
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>
Cc: Hector Martin <marcan@...can.st>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@...all.nl>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
Mohamed Mediouni <mohamed.mediouni@...amail.com>,
Stan Skowronek <stan@...ellium.com>,
Alexander Graf <graf@...zon.com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
DTML <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 14/25] dt-bindings: interrupt-controller: Add DT
bindings for apple-aic
On 2021-02-16 09:41, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 1:17 PM Hector Martin <marcan@...can.st> wrote:
>> +
>> + The 2nd cell contains the interrupt number.
>> + - HW IRQs: interrupt number
>> + - FIQs:
>> + - 0: physical HV timer
>> + - 1: virtual HV timer
>> + - 2: physical guest timer
>> + - 3: virtual guest timer
>
> I wonder if you could just model the FIQ as a single shared level
> interrupt
> (which is essentially what it is), and have every driver that uses it
> do a
> request_irq() on the same IRQ number.
And every driver would simply fail, because we don't allow sharing of
per-CPU interrupts.
M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
Powered by blists - more mailing lists