[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210216185447.GA64303@24bbad8f3778>
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2021 11:54:47 -0700
From: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>
To: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>
Cc: Alexander Lobakin <alobakin@...me>,
Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@...il.com>,
Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...nel.org>,
Pei Huang <huangpei@...ngson.cn>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@...gle.com>,
Fangrui Song <maskray@...gle.com>,
Jiaxun Yang <jiaxun.yang@...goat.com>,
Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>,
Corey Minyard <cminyard@...sta.com>,
kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>,
linux-mips@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
clang-built-linux <clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH mips-next] vmlinux.lds.h: catch more UBSAN symbols into
.data
On Tue, Feb 16, 2021 at 09:56:32AM -0800, 'Nick Desaulniers' via Clang Built Linux wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 16, 2021 at 12:55 AM Alexander Lobakin <alobakin@...me> wrote:
> >
> > LKP triggered lots of LD orphan warnings [0]:
>
> Thanks for the patch, just some questions.
>
> With which linker? Was there a particular config from the bot's
> report that triggered this?
Looks like GNU ld 2.34 (see below).
> >
> > mipsel-linux-ld: warning: orphan section `.data.$Lubsan_data299' from
> > `init/do_mounts_rd.o' being placed in section `.data.$Lubsan_data299'
> > mipsel-linux-ld: warning: orphan section `.data.$Lubsan_data183' from
> > `init/do_mounts_rd.o' being placed in section `.data.$Lubsan_data183'
> > mipsel-linux-ld: warning: orphan section `.data.$Lubsan_type3' from
> > `init/do_mounts_rd.o' being placed in section `.data.$Lubsan_type3'
> > mipsel-linux-ld: warning: orphan section `.data.$Lubsan_type2' from
> > `init/do_mounts_rd.o' being placed in section `.data.$Lubsan_type2'
> > mipsel-linux-ld: warning: orphan section `.data.$Lubsan_type0' from
> > `init/do_mounts_rd.o' being placed in section `.data.$Lubsan_type0'
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > Seems like "unnamed data" isn't the only type of symbols that UBSAN
> > instrumentation can emit.
> > Catch these into .data with the wildcard as well.
> >
> > [0] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/202102160741.k57GCNSR-lkp@intel.com
> >
> > Fixes: f41b233de0ae ("vmlinux.lds.h: catch UBSAN's "unnamed data" into data")
> > Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Alexander Lobakin <alobakin@...me>
> > ---
> > include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h b/include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h
> > index cc659e77fcb0..83537e5ee78f 100644
> > --- a/include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h
> > +++ b/include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h
> > @@ -95,7 +95,7 @@
> > */
> > #ifdef CONFIG_LD_DEAD_CODE_DATA_ELIMINATION
> > #define TEXT_MAIN .text .text.[0-9a-zA-Z_]*
> > -#define DATA_MAIN .data .data.[0-9a-zA-Z_]* .data..L* .data..compoundliteral* .data.$__unnamed_*
> > +#define DATA_MAIN .data .data.[0-9a-zA-Z_]* .data..L* .data..compoundliteral* .data.$__unnamed_* .data.$Lubsan_*
>
> Are these sections only created when
> CONFIG_LD_DEAD_CODE_DATA_ELIMINATION is selected? (Same with
> .data.$__unnamed_*)
Most likely, as that config is set in the problematic config. My guess
is that these are GCC's equivalent of Clang's .data.$__unnamed_...
$ crl https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/202102160741.k57GCNSR-lkp@intel.com/2-a.bin | gzip -d | rg "CONFIG_LD_DEAD_CODE|CONFIG_LD_VERSION"
CONFIG_LD_VERSION=234000000
CONFIG_LD_DEAD_CODE_DATA_ELIMINATION=y
> > #define SDATA_MAIN .sdata .sdata.[0-9a-zA-Z_]*
> > #define RODATA_MAIN .rodata .rodata.[0-9a-zA-Z_]* .rodata..L*
> > #define BSS_MAIN .bss .bss.[0-9a-zA-Z_]* .bss..compoundliteral*
> > --
> > 2.30.1
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Thanks,
> ~Nick Desaulniers
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists