linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH mips-next] vmlinux.lds.h: catch more UBSAN symbols into .data

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 16 Feb 2021 19:03:15 +0000
From:   Alexander Lobakin <alobakin@...me>
To:     Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>
Cc:     Alexander Lobakin <alobakin@...me>,
        Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@...il.com>,
        Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...nel.org>,
        Pei Huang <huangpei@...ngson.cn>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@...gle.com>,
        Fangrui Song <maskray@...gle.com>,
        Jiaxun Yang <jiaxun.yang@...goat.com>,
        Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>,
        Corey Minyard <cminyard@...sta.com>,
        kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>,
        linux-mips@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
        clang-built-linux <clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH mips-next] vmlinux.lds.h: catch more UBSAN symbols into .data

From: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2021 09:56:32 -0800

> On Tue, Feb 16, 2021 at 12:55 AM Alexander Lobakin <alobakin@...me> wrote:
> >
> > LKP triggered lots of LD orphan warnings [0]:
> 
> Thanks for the patch, just some questions.
> 
> With which linker?  Was there a particular config from the bot's
> report that triggered this?

All the info can be found by going through the link from the commit
message. Compiler was GCC 9.3, so I suppose BFD was used as a linker.
I mentioned CONFIG_LD_DEAD_CODE_DATA_ELIMINATION=y in the attached
dotconfig, the warnings and the fix are relevant only for this case.

> >
> > mipsel-linux-ld: warning: orphan section `.data.$Lubsan_data299' from
> > `init/do_mounts_rd.o' being placed in section `.data.$Lubsan_data299'
> > mipsel-linux-ld: warning: orphan section `.data.$Lubsan_data183' from
> > `init/do_mounts_rd.o' being placed in section `.data.$Lubsan_data183'
> > mipsel-linux-ld: warning: orphan section `.data.$Lubsan_type3' from
> > `init/do_mounts_rd.o' being placed in section `.data.$Lubsan_type3'
> > mipsel-linux-ld: warning: orphan section `.data.$Lubsan_type2' from
> > `init/do_mounts_rd.o' being placed in section `.data.$Lubsan_type2'
> > mipsel-linux-ld: warning: orphan section `.data.$Lubsan_type0' from
> > `init/do_mounts_rd.o' being placed in section `.data.$Lubsan_type0'
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > Seems like "unnamed data" isn't the only type of symbols that UBSAN
> > instrumentation can emit.
> > Catch these into .data with the wildcard as well.
> >
> > [0] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/202102160741.k57GCNSR-lkp@intel.com
> >
> > Fixes: f41b233de0ae ("vmlinux.lds.h: catch UBSAN's "unnamed data" into data")
> > Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Alexander Lobakin <alobakin@...me>
> > ---
> >  include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h | 2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h b/include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h
> > index cc659e77fcb0..83537e5ee78f 100644
> > --- a/include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h
> > +++ b/include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h
> > @@ -95,7 +95,7 @@
> >   */
> >  #ifdef CONFIG_LD_DEAD_CODE_DATA_ELIMINATION
> >  #define TEXT_MAIN .text .text.[0-9a-zA-Z_]*
> > -#define DATA_MAIN .data .data.[0-9a-zA-Z_]* .data..L* .data..compoundliteral* .data.$__unnamed_*
> > +#define DATA_MAIN .data .data.[0-9a-zA-Z_]* .data..L* .data..compoundliteral* .data.$__unnamed_* .data.$Lubsan_*
> 
> Are these sections only created when
> CONFIG_LD_DEAD_CODE_DATA_ELIMINATION is selected?  (Same with
> .data.$__unnamed_*)
> 
> >  #define SDATA_MAIN .sdata .sdata.[0-9a-zA-Z_]*
> >  #define RODATA_MAIN .rodata .rodata.[0-9a-zA-Z_]* .rodata..L*
> >  #define BSS_MAIN .bss .bss.[0-9a-zA-Z_]* .bss..compoundliteral*
> > --
> > 2.30.1
> >
> >
> 
> 
> -- 
> Thanks,
> ~Nick Desaulniers

Al