linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] exfat: add initial ioctl function

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 17 Feb 2021 09:13:35 +0900
From:   Hyeongseok Kim <hyeongseok@...il.com>
To:     Chaitanya Kulkarni <Chaitanya.Kulkarni@....com>,
        "namjae.jeon@...sung.com" <namjae.jeon@...sung.com>,
        "sj1557.seo@...sung.com" <sj1557.seo@...sung.com>
Cc:     "linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] exfat: add initial ioctl function

On 2/17/21 8:51 AM, Chaitanya Kulkarni wrote:
> On 2/16/21 14:36, Hyeongseok Kim wrote:
>> Initialize empty ioctl function
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Hyeongseok Kim <hyeongseok@...il.com>
> This patch doesn't do much, but this commit log could be better.
Sorry, I don't understand exactly.
You're saying that these 2 patch should be merged to a single patch?
Would it be better?
>
> Also from my experience there is not point in introducing an empty
> function.
>