[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <fa8195f9-4d1b-7a77-1a02-d69710f4208b@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2021 10:43:21 +0100
From: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, joaodias@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: be more verbose for alloc_contig_range faliures
On 18.02.21 10:35, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Thu 18-02-21 10:02:43, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>> On 18.02.21 09:56, Michal Hocko wrote:
>>> On Wed 17-02-21 08:36:03, Minchan Kim wrote:
>>>> alloc_contig_range is usually used on cma area or movable zone.
>>>> It's critical if the page migration fails on those areas so
>>>> dump more debugging message like memory_hotplug unless user
>>>> specifiy __GFP_NOWARN.
>>>
>>> I agree with David that this has a potential to generate a lot of output
>>> and it is not really clear whether it is worth it. Page isolation code
>>> already has REPORT_FAILURE mode which currently used only for the memory
>>> hotplug because this was just too noisy from the CMA path - d381c54760dc
>>> ("mm: only report isolation failures when offlining memory").
>>>
>>> Maybe migration failures are less likely to fail but still.
>>
>> Side note: I really dislike that uncontrolled error reporting on memory
>> offlining path we have enabled as default. Yeah, it might be useful for
>> ZONE_MOVABLE in some cases, but otherwise it's just noise.
>>
>> Just do a "sudo stress-ng --memhotplug 1" and see the log getting flooded
>
> Anyway we can discuss this in a separate thread but I think this is not
> a representative workload.
Sure, but the essence is "this is noise", and we'll have more noise on
alloc_contig_range() as we see these calls more frequently. There should
be an explicit way to enable such *debug* messages.
--
Thanks,
David / dhildenb
Powered by blists - more mailing lists