[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJhGHyA6gtufYfZ5CmFnS-Uyu8VC0G9uFoiJQO6-ZTTUBB-eXQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2021 10:45:20 +0800
From: Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>
To: "Zhang, Qiang" <qiang.zhang@...driver.com>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] workqueue: Move the position of debug_work_activate() in __queue_work()
On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 4:24 PM <qiang.zhang@...driver.com> wrote:
>
> From: Zqiang <qiang.zhang@...driver.com>
>
> The debug_work_activate() is called on the premise that
> the work can be inserted, because if wq be in WQ_DRAINING
> status, insert work may be failed.
>
Please add:
Fixes: e41e704bc4f49 ("workqueue: improve destroy_workqueue() debuggability")
The code looks good to me.
Reviewed-by: Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>
> Signed-off-by: Zqiang <qiang.zhang@...driver.com>
> ---
> kernel/workqueue.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
> index 0d150da252e8..21fb00b52def 100644
> --- a/kernel/workqueue.c
> +++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
> @@ -1412,7 +1412,6 @@ static void __queue_work(int cpu, struct workqueue_struct *wq,
> */
> lockdep_assert_irqs_disabled();
>
> - debug_work_activate(work);
>
> /* if draining, only works from the same workqueue are allowed */
> if (unlikely(wq->flags & __WQ_DRAINING) &&
> @@ -1494,6 +1493,7 @@ static void __queue_work(int cpu, struct workqueue_struct *wq,
> worklist = &pwq->delayed_works;
> }
>
> + debug_work_activate(work);
> insert_work(pwq, work, worklist, work_flags);
>
> out:
> --
> 2.25.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists