[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210219103035.GA656626@infradead.org>
Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2021 10:30:35 +0000
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
Cc: Yiwei Zhang <zzyiwei@...roid.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Felix Kuehling <Felix.Kuehling@....com>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>,
Ilias Stamatis <stamatis.iliass@...il.com>,
Rob Clark <robdclark@...omium.org>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
Liang Chen <cl@...k-chips.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
kernel-team <kernel-team@...roid.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kthread: add kthread_mod_pending_delayed_work api
On Fri, Feb 19, 2021 at 11:27:13AM +0100, Petr Mladek wrote:
> I am personally fine with adding this API. I am going to
> comment the original code. Well, there might be a push-back
> from other people because there will be no in-tree user.
Adding a new API without an intree user is a complete no-go.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists