[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <QYs3MUT8alABsssQUgn1j3b7BF6zgqqiBq0-76Rqcpo6lPFnKyfd8iAagAfotVhDzKP6FFRIjlRVVoIaRtCAEaNT3P-4gyF43rTEPEsvqEA=@protonmail.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2021 10:31:49 +0000
From: Jari Ruusu <jariruusu@...tonmail.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>,
Jari Ruusu <jariruusu@...rs.sourceforge.net>,
Scott Branden <scott.branden@...adcom.com>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
BCM Kernel Feedback <bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>
Subject: Re: 5.10 LTS Kernel: 2 or 6 years?
On Friday, February 19, 2021 10:22 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> That's not the goal of stable kernel releases/trees. If the driver
> version that is in 4.19.y does not work for you on release 4.19.0, odds
> of that "changing" in later stable releases is slim to none.
But in-tree iwlwifi worked fine on 4.9.y and 4.14.y , and then got broken
in later 4.14.y versions. I tried later versions of 4.19.y in an attempt to
fix the breakage. Basically you are are saying that I should have NOT
attempted to upgrage 4.9.y -> 4.14.y -> 4.19.y
--
Jari Ruusu 4096R/8132F189 12D6 4C3A DCDA 0AA4 27BD ACDF F073 3C80 8132 F189
Powered by blists - more mailing lists