[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ce531f446993574b0c56d787b35fe73d@codeaurora.org>
Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2021 18:59:07 +0530
From: nitirawa@...eaurora.org
To: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
stanley.chu@...iatek.com
Cc: asutoshd@...eaurora.org, cang@...eaurora.org,
stummala@...eaurora.org, vbadigan@...eaurora.org,
alim.akhtar@...sung.com, jejb@...ux.ibm.com,
martin.petersen@...cle.com, stanley.chu@...iatek.com,
beanhuo@...ron.com, bvanassche@....org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Avri Altman <Avri.Altman@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V1 0/3] scsi: ufs: Add a vops to configure VCC voltage
level
On 2021-02-08 17:52, Avri Altman wrote:
>> >> The flow should be generic - isn't it?
>> >> Why do you need the entire flow to be vendor-specific?
>> >> Why not just the parameters vendor-specific?
>> >>
>> >> Thanks,
>> >> Avri
>> >
>> > Hi Avri,
>> > This vops change was done as per the below mail thread
>> > discussion where it was decided to go with vops and
>> > let vendors handle it, until specs provides more clarity.
>> >
>> > https://www.spinics.net/lists/kernel/msg3754995.html
>> >
>> > Regards,
>> > Nitin
>>
>> Hi Avri,
>> Please let me know if you have any further comments on this.
> No further comments.
> Looks like you need an ack from Stanley or Bjorn who proposed this
> approach.
>
> Thanks,
> Avri
Hi Stanley/Bjorn,
Please can you review this patch and provide your input.
Regards,
Nitin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists