linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH V1 0/3] scsi: ufs: Add a vops to configure VCC voltage level

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 8 Feb 2021 12:22:05 +0000
From:   Avri Altman <Avri.Altman@....com>
To:     "nitirawa@...eaurora.org" <nitirawa@...eaurora.org>
CC:     "asutoshd@...eaurora.org" <asutoshd@...eaurora.org>,
        "cang@...eaurora.org" <cang@...eaurora.org>,
        "stummala@...eaurora.org" <stummala@...eaurora.org>,
        "vbadigan@...eaurora.org" <vbadigan@...eaurora.org>,
        "alim.akhtar@...sung.com" <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
        "jejb@...ux.ibm.com" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
        "martin.petersen@...cle.com" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
        "stanley.chu@...iatek.com" <stanley.chu@...iatek.com>,
        "beanhuo@...ron.com" <beanhuo@...ron.com>,
        "bvanassche@....org" <bvanassche@....org>,
        "linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH V1 0/3] scsi: ufs: Add a vops to configure VCC voltage
 level

> >> The flow should be generic - isn't it?
> >> Why do you need the entire flow to be vendor-specific?
> >> Why not just the parameters vendor-specific?
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Avri
> >
> > Hi Avri,
> > This vops change was done as per the below mail thread
> > discussion where it was decided to go with vops and
> > let vendors handle it, until specs provides more clarity.
> >
> > https://www.spinics.net/lists/kernel/msg3754995.html
> >
> > Regards,
> > Nitin
> 
> Hi Avri,
> Please let me know if you have any further comments on this.
No further comments.
Looks like you need an ack from Stanley or Bjorn who proposed this approach.

Thanks,
Avri