linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] leds: lp50xx: add setting of default intensity from DT

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 19 Feb 2021 16:50:56 +0200
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Sven Schuchmann <schuchmann@...leissheimer.de>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc:     Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, Dan Murphy <dmurphy@...com>,
        "linux-leds@...r.kernel.org" <linux-leds@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] leds: lp50xx: add setting of default intensity
 from DT

On Fri, Feb 19, 2021 at 02:09:03PM +0000, Sven Schuchmann wrote:
> > Von: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
> > Gesendet: Freitag, 19. Februar 2021 14:56

> > > > > > Can you or Dan submit patch getting the regulator support to work? If
> > > > > > not, I guess we should remove the regulator support after all.
> > > > >
> > > > > To be true I am fairly new to the kernel and have no idea
> > > > > how to test this. So no, I don't want provide a patch (except
> > > > > for removing), sorry.
> > > >
> > > > No problem. It seems Andy submitted series for this.
> > > >
> > >
> > > To me it seems that patches from Andy don't make
> > > the regulator work. Maybe I am wrong?
> > 
> > I;m not sure I understand this correctly. Do you mean that my patches broke
> > something? Which one explicitly and what is broken?
> 
> No, your patches do not break something (as far as I can see).
> Pavel asked for a patch to fix the regulator. The regulator
> at this time is only initialized but never used in the lp50xx.
> I told him (see above) that I cannot provide a patch which
> fixes this. He answered that you fixed this in your series,
> but to me it doesn't seem so.
> or did you fix the regulator usage in your patch series?

No, I haven't touched regulator and I see now what is there.
One may add some code, I know Linus did it in many places, maybe he can help to
have done this properly?


-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko