linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] leds: lp50xx: add setting of default intensity from DT

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20210219180721.GA8596@duo.ucw.cz>
Date:   Fri, 19 Feb 2021 19:07:21 +0100
From:   Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To:     Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
Cc:     Sven Schuchmann <schuchmann@...leissheimer.de>,
        Dan Murphy <dmurphy@...com>,
        "linux-leds@...r.kernel.org" <linux-leds@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] leds: lp50xx: add setting of default intensity
 from DT

On Fri 2021-02-19 16:18:38, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 19, 2021 at 1:19 PM Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz> wrote:
> > > > > > ? Does not make sense and changelog does not help.
> > > > >
> > > > > This is an unused variable which is in the driver
> > > > > (same as the regulator). Should I provide a patch on its own for that
> > > > > or just describe in the changelog?
> > > >
> > > > Lets do separate patch here. DT changes will need Ack from Rob, this
> > > > can go in directly.
> > >
> > > Okay, I will submit a separate patch
> > >
> > > > Can you or Dan submit patch getting the regulator support to work? If
> > > > not, I guess we should remove the regulator support after all.
> > >
> > > To be true I am fairly new to the kernel and have no idea
> > > how to test this. So no, I don't want provide a patch (except
> > > for removing), sorry.
> >
> > No problem. It seems Andy submitted series for this.
> 
> Ah, now I understand what you, Sven, meant.
> I didn't touch regulator code, so it left the same, but making it work
> probably needs just enabling during ->probe().

Yep, sorry, I was confused.

Anyway, I'd rather seen patch fixing the regulator code than removing
it completely.

Best regards,
								Pavel
-- 
http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (196 bytes)