lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b4c660b0-ab0e-ec4c-2771-346ca164bf92@kernel.dk>
Date:   Fri, 19 Feb 2021 09:37:46 -0700
From:   Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
To:     Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>,
        linux-mips@...r.kernel.org,
        Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        io-uring@...r.kernel.org, open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org
Cc:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
        Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [next]: fs/io_uring.c:6171:10: error: implicit declaration of
 function 'io_sendmsg_prep_async'; did you mean 'io_req_prep_async'?

On 2/19/21 9:08 AM, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> Linux next tag 20210219 arm and mips builds failed due to below error.
> 
> Following build configs failed
> arm (s3c6400_defconfig) with gcc-8
> arm (s3c6400_defconfig) with gcc-9
> arm (s3c6400_defconfig) with gcc-10
> 
> mips (e55_defconfig) with gcc-8
> mips (e55_defconfig) with gcc-9
> mips (e55_defconfig) with gcc-10
> 
> fs/io_uring.c:6171:10: error: implicit declaration of function
> 'io_sendmsg_prep_async'; did you mean 'io_req_prep_async'?
> [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>    return io_sendmsg_prep_async(req);
>           ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>           io_req_prep_async
> 
> Reported-by: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>

This should fix it, cleaning it up a bit at the same time.


commit b1c892df32ebf6f30c995e23dcafeae2392ad1bc
Author: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Date:   Fri Feb 19 09:35:19 2021 -0700

    io_uring: make the !CONFIG_NET helpers a bit more robust
    
    With the prep and prep async split, we now have potentially 3 helpers
    that need to be defined for !CONFIG_NET. Add some helpers to do just
    that.
    
    Fixes the following compile error on !CONFIG_NET:
    
    fs/io_uring.c:6171:10: error: implicit declaration of function
    'io_sendmsg_prep_async'; did you mean 'io_req_prep_async'?
    [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
       return io_sendmsg_prep_async(req);
                 ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
                 io_req_prep_async
    
    Fixes: 93642ef88434 ("io_uring: split sqe-prep and async setup")
    Reported-by: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>
    Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>

diff --git a/fs/io_uring.c b/fs/io_uring.c
index b7bae301744b..c9a5c498dc3b 100644
--- a/fs/io_uring.c
+++ b/fs/io_uring.c
@@ -5127,56 +5127,32 @@ static int io_connect(struct io_kiocb *req, unsigned int issue_flags)
 	return 0;
 }
 #else /* !CONFIG_NET */
-static int io_sendmsg_prep(struct io_kiocb *req, const struct io_uring_sqe *sqe)
-{
-	return -EOPNOTSUPP;
-}
-
-static int io_sendmsg(struct io_kiocb *req, unsigned int issue_flags)
-{
-	return -EOPNOTSUPP;
-}
-
-static int io_send(struct io_kiocb *req, unsigned int issue_flags)
-{
-	return -EOPNOTSUPP;
-}
-
-static int io_recvmsg_prep(struct io_kiocb *req,
-			   const struct io_uring_sqe *sqe)
-{
-	return -EOPNOTSUPP;
-}
-
-static int io_recvmsg(struct io_kiocb *req, unsigned int issue_flags)
-{
-	return -EOPNOTSUPP;
-}
-
-static int io_recv(struct io_kiocb *req, unsigned int issue_flags)
-{
-	return -EOPNOTSUPP;
-}
-
-static int io_accept_prep(struct io_kiocb *req, const struct io_uring_sqe *sqe)
-{
-	return -EOPNOTSUPP;
-}
-
-static int io_accept(struct io_kiocb *req, unsigned int issue_flags)
-{
-	return -EOPNOTSUPP;
-}
-
-static int io_connect_prep(struct io_kiocb *req, const struct io_uring_sqe *sqe)
-{
-	return -EOPNOTSUPP;
-}
-
-static int io_connect(struct io_kiocb *req, unsigned int issue_flags)
-{
-	return -EOPNOTSUPP;
-}
+#define IO_NETOP_FN(op)							\
+static int io_##op(struct io_kiocb *req, unsigned int issue_flags)	\
+{									\
+	return -EOPNOTSUPP;						\
+}
+
+#define IO_NETOP_PREP(op)						\
+IO_NETOP_FN(op)								\
+static int io_##op##_prep(struct io_kiocb *req, const struct io_uring_sqe *sqe) \
+{									\
+	return -EOPNOTSUPP;						\
+}									\
+
+#define IO_NETOP_PREP_ASYNC(op)						\
+IO_NETOP_PREP(op)							\
+static int io_##op##_prep_async(struct io_kiocb *req)			\
+{									\
+	return -EOPNOTSUPP;						\
+}
+
+IO_NETOP_PREP_ASYNC(sendmsg);
+IO_NETOP_PREP_ASYNC(recvmsg);
+IO_NETOP_PREP_ASYNC(connect);
+IO_NETOP_PREP(accept);
+IO_NETOP_FN(send);
+IO_NETOP_FN(recv);
 #endif /* CONFIG_NET */
 
 struct io_poll_table {

-- 
Jens Axboe

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ