[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210221155314.56f55e85@archlinux>
Date: Sun, 21 Feb 2021 15:53:14 +0000
From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
To: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
Benson Leung <bleung@...omium.org>,
Guenter Roeck <groeck@...omium.org>,
Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
Gwendal Grignou <gwendal@...omium.org>,
Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@...labora.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 3/3] iio: proximity: Add a ChromeOS EC MKBP proximity
driver
On Sun, 14 Feb 2021 12:39:58 -0800
Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org> wrote:
> Quoting Jonathan Cameron (2021-02-14 04:48:09)
> > On Wed, 10 Feb 2021 18:46:01 -0800
> > Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org> wrote:
> >
> > > Add support for a ChromeOS EC proximity driver that exposes a "front"
> > > proximity sensor via the IIO subsystem. The EC decides when front
> > > proximity is near and sets an MKBP switch 'EC_MKBP_FRONT_PROXIMITY' to
> > > notify the kernel of proximity. Similarly, when proximity detects
> > > something far away it sets the switch bit to 0. For now this driver
> > > exposes a single sensor, but it could be expanded in the future via more
> > > MKBP bits if desired.
> > >
> > > Cc: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
> > > Cc: Benson Leung <bleung@...omium.org>
> > > Cc: Guenter Roeck <groeck@...omium.org>
> > > Cc: Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
> > > Cc: Gwendal Grignou <gwendal@...omium.org>
> > > Reviewed-by: Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@...labora.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>
> >
> > I'm fine with this, but want to leave a little time for others to take
> > one last look. We've missed the coming merge window now anyway.
> >
> > If I seem to have forgotten this in a couple of weeks, feel free to
> > give me a bump.
> >
>
> Ok no problem. Gwendal had some comments on v5 that may be applicable
> here too but I think they mostly mean that the resume handler may not be
> needed if cros ec is fixed. Having the resume handler shouldn't hurt
> though unless I missed something. Gwendal?
@Gwendal, could you take a quick glance at this, or alternatively let
us know if you need more time to get to it.
Thanks,
Jonathan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists