[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPUE2uu90ySZu6iyanakBZ+Oy-1YSTaHwBaeZdnUxK3ncW9BZA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2021 13:23:35 -0800
From: Gwendal Grignou <gwendal@...omium.org>
To: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
Cc: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-iio <linux-iio@...r.kernel.org>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
Benson Leung <bleung@...omium.org>,
Guenter Roeck <groeck@...omium.org>,
Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@...labora.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 3/3] iio: proximity: Add a ChromeOS EC MKBP proximity driver
On Sun, Feb 21, 2021 at 7:53 AM Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Sun, 14 Feb 2021 12:39:58 -0800
> Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org> wrote:
>
> > Quoting Jonathan Cameron (2021-02-14 04:48:09)
> > > On Wed, 10 Feb 2021 18:46:01 -0800
> > > Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Add support for a ChromeOS EC proximity driver that exposes a "front"
> > > > proximity sensor via the IIO subsystem. The EC decides when front
> > > > proximity is near and sets an MKBP switch 'EC_MKBP_FRONT_PROXIMITY' to
> > > > notify the kernel of proximity. Similarly, when proximity detects
> > > > something far away it sets the switch bit to 0. For now this driver
> > > > exposes a single sensor, but it could be expanded in the future via more
> > > > MKBP bits if desired.
> > > >
> > > > Cc: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
> > > > Cc: Benson Leung <bleung@...omium.org>
> > > > Cc: Guenter Roeck <groeck@...omium.org>
> > > > Cc: Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
> > > > Cc: Gwendal Grignou <gwendal@...omium.org>
> > > > Reviewed-by: Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@...labora.com>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>
> > >
> > > I'm fine with this, but want to leave a little time for others to take
> > > one last look. We've missed the coming merge window now anyway.
> > >
> > > If I seem to have forgotten this in a couple of weeks, feel free to
> > > give me a bump.
> > >
> >
> > Ok no problem. Gwendal had some comments on v5 that may be applicable
> > here too but I think they mostly mean that the resume handler may not be
> > needed if cros ec is fixed. Having the resume handler shouldn't hurt
> > though unless I missed something. Gwendal?
>
> @Gwendal, could you take a quick glance at this, or alternatively let
> us know if you need more time to get to it.
It will work as is.
Reviewed-by: Gwendal Grignou <gwendal@...omium.org>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jonathan
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists