[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YEvbcrTZyiUAxZAu@google.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2021 13:21:54 -0800
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
To: Kai Huang <kai.huang@...el.com>
Cc: kvm@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org, linux-sgx@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jarkko@...nel.org, luto@...nel.org,
dave.hansen@...el.com, rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com,
haitao.huang@...el.com, pbonzini@...hat.com, bp@...en8.de,
tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, hpa@...or.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 03/25] x86/sgx: Wipe out EREMOVE from
sgx_free_epc_page()
On Thu, Mar 11, 2021, Kai Huang wrote:
> From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org>
>
> EREMOVE takes a page and removes any association between that page and
> an enclave. It must be run on a page before it can be added into
> another enclave. Currently, EREMOVE is run as part of pages being freed
> into the SGX page allocator. It is not expected to fail.
>
> KVM does not track how guest pages are used, which means that SGX
> virtualization use of EREMOVE might fail.
>
> Break out the EREMOVE call from the SGX page allocator. This will allow
> the SGX virtualization code to use the allocator directly. (SGX/KVM
> will also introduce a more permissive EREMOVE helper).
>
> Implement original sgx_free_epc_page() as sgx_encl_free_epc_page() to be
> more specific that it is used to free EPC page assigned to one enclave.
> Print an error message when EREMOVE fails to explicitly call out EPC
> page is leaked, and requires machine reboot to get leaked pages back.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org>
> Co-developed-by: Kai Huang <kai.huang@...el.com>
> Acked-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Kai Huang <kai.huang@...el.com>
> ---
> v2->v3:
>
> - Fixed bug during copy/paste which results in SECS page and va pages are not
> correctly freed in sgx_encl_release() (sorry for the mistake).
> - Added Jarkko's Acked-by.
That Acked-by should either be dropped or moved above Co-developed-by to make
checkpatch happy.
Reviewed-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists