[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJKOXPdhbwpEHA+h3706NXf0uRhyu8VVC++K8WpzA6h2=8PK8Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2021 19:38:47 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Heiko Thiery <heiko.thiery@...il.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@....com>,
Li Yang <leoyang.li@....com>, Michael Walle <michael@...le.cc>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] arm64: dts: fsl: add support for Kontron pitx-imx8m board
On Mon, 22 Feb 2021 at 10:09, Heiko Thiery <heiko.thiery@...il.com> wrote:
> > > > > +
> > > > > + pcie0_refclk: pcie0-refclk {
> > > >
> > > > Generic node names (from the dt spec candidate is "clock").
> > >
> > > Should I simply set the node name to pcie0-clock? And pcie1-clock for
> > > the next one?
> >
> > I am fine with "pcie0-clock" or just "clock-0".
>
> I saw now that in "imx8mq-zii-ultra.dtsi" the name
> "clock-pcie0-refclk" is used. Can I use the same?
It's not that generic anymore - but specific, but it's also not that
important, so go ahead.
> > >
> > > When I run "make dtbs_check" it runs quite a long time and stops with
> > > an error. But as far as I can say there is an error coming from the
> > > included "imx8mq.dtsi".
> > >
> > > You can see the output here: https://pastebin.com/raw/iU2geBDh
> >
> > Looks fine (except the error tool :) ).
>
> What do you mean with error tool?
I lost some words on the wire - I meant: "except the error from the
tool itself".
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists