[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1614069836.8409.0.camel@realtek.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2021 08:43:59 +0000
From: Pkshih <pkshih@...ltek.com>
To: "kvalo@...eaurora.org" <kvalo@...eaurora.org>
CC: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"tony0620emma@...il.com" <tony0620emma@...il.com>,
Timlee <timlee@...ltek.com>,
"zhanjun@...ontech.com" <zhanjun@...ontech.com>,
"kuba@...nel.org" <kuba@...nel.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"arnd@...db.de" <arnd@...db.de>,
"chenhaoa@...ontech.com" <chenhaoa@...ontech.com>,
"linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] rtw88: 8822ce: fix wifi disconnect after S3/S4 on HONOR laptop
On Tue, 2021-02-23 at 09:08 +0200, Kalle Valo wrote:
> Pkshih <pkshih@...ltek.com> writes:
>
> >> > --- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/rtw8822ce.c
> >> > +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/rtw8822ce.c
> >> > @@ -25,7 +25,6 @@ static struct pci_driver rtw_8822ce_driver = {
> >> > .id_table = rtw_8822ce_id_table,
> >> > .probe = rtw_pci_probe,
> >> > .remove = rtw_pci_remove,
> >> > - .driver.pm = &rtw_pm_ops,
> >>
> >> Why just 8822ce? Why not remove rtw_pm_ops entirely if it just creates
> >> problems?
> >
> > I think we can't remove rtw_pm_ops, because wowlan will not work.
>
> Ah. A comment code in the code stating that would be nice.
>
I'll do it.
Thanks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists