[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210223160932.GD1261797@rowland.harvard.edu>
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2021 11:09:32 -0500
From: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
To: Álvaro Fernández Rojas <noltari@...il.com>
Cc: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Jonas Gorski <jonas.gorski@...il.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: usb: generic-ehci: document ignore-oc
flag
On Tue, Feb 23, 2021 at 05:04:57PM +0100, Álvaro Fernández Rojas wrote:
> Hi Alan,
>
> > El 23 feb 2021, a las 16:54, Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu> escribió:
> >
> > On Tue, Feb 23, 2021 at 04:50:04PM +0100, Álvaro Fernández Rojas wrote:
> >> Over-current reporting isn't supported on some platforms such as bcm63xx.
> >> These devices will incorrectly report over-current if this flag isn't properly
> >> activated.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Álvaro Fernández Rojas <noltari@...il.com>
> >> ---
> >> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/generic-ehci.yaml | 5 +++++
> >> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/generic-ehci.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/generic-ehci.yaml
> >> index cf83f2d9afac..294bbf02399e 100644
> >> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/generic-ehci.yaml
> >> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/generic-ehci.yaml
> >> @@ -117,6 +117,11 @@ properties:
> >> Set this flag if EHCI has a Transaction Translator built into
> >> the root hub.
> >>
> >> + ignore-oc:
> >> + $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/flag
> >> + description:
> >> + Set this flag for HCDs without over-current reporting support.
> >
> > This is not a good description of a device property. DT entries are
> > supposed to described the hardware, not talk about how to use it.
>
> Any suggestions on a proper description?
>
> >
> > When you say that the bcm63xx doesn't support over-current reporting,
> > what exactly do you mean? Do you mean that sometimes the hardware turns
> > on the over-current bit when an over-current isn't actually present? Or
> > do you mean something else?
>
> Yes, the hardware turns on the over-current bit with no over-current present.
Okay, in that case the property should be named something like
"spurious_oc", and the description should say something like:
Set this flag to indicate that the hardware sometimes turns on
the OC bit when an over-current isn't actually present.
Alan Stern
Powered by blists - more mailing lists