[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <52a30738-08b5-740c-7c6e-b7a6edcbe552@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2021 18:19:43 +0100
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
Like Xu <like.xu@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] KVM: vmx/pmu: Fix dummy check if lbr_desc->event is
created
On 23/02/21 18:15, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> If event
> creation fails in that flow, I would think KVM would do its best to create an
> event in future runs without waiting for additional actions from the guest.
>
> Also, this bug suggests there's a big gaping hole in the test coverage. AFAICT,
> event contention would lead to a #GP crash in the host due to lbr_desc->event
> being dereferenced, no?
Yes, testing contention would use the tools/testing/selftests/kvm
framework rather than just kvm-unit-tests.
Paolo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists