[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210224085010.28c66ba8@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2021 08:50:10 +1100
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@...nel.org>
Cc: "Ernst, Justin" <justin.ernst@....com>,
"Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build warning in Linus' tree
Hi all,
On Thu, 18 Feb 2021 22:47:57 +0000 "Ernst, Justin" <justin.ernst@....com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
> We made a special effort to squash the unexpected indentation warnings in c159376490ee (https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20201130214304.369348-1-justin.ernst@hpe.com/), so I was surprised to see this again.
> Commit:
>
> c9624cb7db1c ("x86/platform/uv: Update sysfs documentation")
>
> is the culprit here. I suspect it was written and submitted before we made the effort to fix the Unexpected indentation in c159376490ee, so it misplaced the first line of a codeblock, the original problem that was reported and fixed.
>
> The fix:
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-firmware-sgi_uv b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-firmware-sgi_uv
> index 637c668cbe45..12ed843e1d3e 100644
> --- a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-firmware-sgi_uv
> +++ b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-firmware-sgi_uv
> @@ -39,8 +39,8 @@ Description:
>
> The uv_type entry contains the hub revision number.
> This value can be used to identify the UV system version::
> - "0.*" = Hubless UV ('*' is subtype)
>
> + "0.*" = Hubless UV ('*' is subtype)
> "3.0" = UV2
> "5.0" = UV3
> "7.0" = UV4
>
> Thanks,
> Justin
>
> > Building Linus' tree, today's linux-next build (htmldocs) produced
> > this warning:
> >
> > Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-firmware-sgi_uv:2: WARNING: Unexpected indentation.
> >
> > Introduced by commit
> >
> > c159376490ee ("x86/platform/uv: Update ABI documentation of /sys/firmware/sgi_uv/")
> >
> > Or maybe an ealier one.
> >
> > This has been around for some time.
I am still seeing this warning.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists