linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] [RFC]ARM: ftrace: pause/unpause function graph tracer in cpu

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 24 Feb 2021 19:14:54 +0800
From:   liang wang <liang26812@...il.com>
To:     Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@...linux.org.uk>
Cc:     akpm@...ux-foundation.org, rppt@...nel.org, geert@...ux-m68k.org,
        penberg@...nel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [RFC]ARM: ftrace: pause/unpause function graph tracer in cpu_suspend()

Hi Russell,

On Wed, 24 Feb 2021 at 18:39, Russell King - ARM Linux admin
<linux@...linux.org.uk> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 06:35:47PM +0800, liang wang wrote:
> > Hi,all
> >
> > ftrace function_graph tracer always cause kernel panic on my ARM device with
> > multiple CPUs, I found a solution for the problem on ARM64, refers to
> > the patch above,
> > I was wondering why this bugfix on ARM64 hasn't been upstreamed to ARM,
>
> Patches get applied to the ARM tree after they've been submitted to
> the patch system. If they don't get submitted to the patch system,
> then they get buried and forgotten.
>
> --
> RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
> FTTP is here! 40Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!

Thanks for replying,
So I refers to the solution on ARM64 and sent my patch on January as below.

http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2021-January/628460.html

But I haven't got any replies on my patch. How can I get my patch reviewed
and submitted to the patch system?Should I resend a new patch to this maillist?
Thanks!