[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210225032615epcms2p6679f3571205dc7a9c222f07398a9726c@epcms2p6>
Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2021 12:26:15 +0900
From: Daejun Park <daejun7.park@...sung.com>
To: Avri Altman <Avri.Altman@....com>,
Daejun Park <daejun7.park@...sung.com>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"jejb@...ux.ibm.com" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
"martin.petersen@...cle.com" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
"asutoshd@...eaurora.org" <asutoshd@...eaurora.org>,
"stanley.chu@...iatek.com" <stanley.chu@...iatek.com>,
"cang@...eaurora.org" <cang@...eaurora.org>,
"bvanassche@....org" <bvanassche@....org>,
"huobean@...il.com" <huobean@...il.com>,
ALIM AKHTAR <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>
CC: "linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
JinHwan Park <jh.i.park@...sung.com>,
Javier Gonzalez <javier.gonz@...sung.com>,
SEUNGUK SHIN <seunguk.shin@...sung.com>,
Sung-Jun Park <sungjun07.park@...sung.com>,
yongmyung lee <ymhungry.lee@...sung.com>,
Jinyoung CHOI <j-young.choi@...sung.com>,
BoRam Shin <boram.shin@...sung.com>
Subject: RE: RE: [PATCH v24 4/4] scsi: ufs: Add HPB 2.0 support
> > if (dev_info->wspecversion >= UFS_DEV_HPB_SUPPORT_VERSION &&
> > (b_ufs_feature_sup & UFS_DEV_HPB_SUPPORT)) {
> > - dev_info->hpb_enabled = true;
> > + bool hpb_en = false;
> > +
> > ufshpb_get_dev_info(hba, desc_buf);
> > +
> > + err = ufshcd_query_flag_retry(hba,
> > UPIU_QUERY_OPCODE_READ_FLAG,
> > + QUERY_FLAG_IDN_HPB_EN, 0, &hpb_en);
> > + if (ufshpb_is_legacy(hba) || (!err && hpb_en))
> If is_legacy you shouldn't send fHPBen in the first place, not ignoring its failure.
OK,
> Also, using a Boolean is limiting you to HPB2.0 vs. HPB1.0.
> What would you do in new flags/attributes/descriptors that HPB3.0 will introduce?
It can be managed as enum. but it is enough now, I think.
> > + dev_info->hpb_enabled = true;
> > }
Thanks,
Daejun
Powered by blists - more mailing lists