lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 25 Feb 2021 12:14:17 -0800
From:   Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>,
        Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>,
        Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
        Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>,
        Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>,
        Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@...gle.com>,
        Arvind Sankar <nivedita@...m.mit.edu>,
        Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
        clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] linux/compiler-clang.h: define HAVE_BUILTIN_BSWAP*

On Thu, Feb 25, 2021 at 12:06:37PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Feb 2021 12:03:48 -0800 Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> wrote:
> 
> > On Thu, Feb 25, 2021 at 05:45:09PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > > From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
> > > 
> > > Separating compiler-clang.h from compiler-gcc.h inadventently dropped the
> > > definitions of the three HAVE_BUILTIN_BSWAP macros, which requires falling
> > > back to the open-coded version and hoping that the compiler detects it.
> > > 
> > > Since all versions of clang support the __builtin_bswap interfaces,
> > > add back the flags and have the headers pick these up automatically.
> > > 
> > > This results in a 4% improvement of compilation speed for arm defconfig.
> > > 
> > > Fixes: 815f0ddb346c ("include/linux/compiler*.h: make compiler-*.h mutually exclusive")
> > > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
> > 
> > Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
> 
> I figured 4% better compile time isn't significant enough to justify a
> backport.  Thoughts?

It's a trivial change, so I think it's worth it?

> 
> > Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
> 

-- 
Kees Cook

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ