[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20210226182825.11394-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2021 20:28:25 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-input@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>,
Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH v1 1/1] HID: i2c-hid: acpi: Drop redundant ACPI_PTR()
The driver depends on ACPI, ACPI_PTR() resolution is always the same.
Otherwise a compiler may produce a warning.
That said, the rule of thumb either ugly ifdeffery with ACPI_PTR or
none should be used in a driver.
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
---
drivers/hid/i2c-hid/i2c-hid-acpi.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/hid/i2c-hid/i2c-hid-acpi.c b/drivers/hid/i2c-hid/i2c-hid-acpi.c
index 00bbd218f1e8..d35ff3f16a5b 100644
--- a/drivers/hid/i2c-hid/i2c-hid-acpi.c
+++ b/drivers/hid/i2c-hid/i2c-hid-acpi.c
@@ -131,7 +131,7 @@ static struct i2c_driver i2c_hid_acpi_driver = {
.name = "i2c_hid_acpi",
.pm = &i2c_hid_core_pm,
.probe_type = PROBE_PREFER_ASYNCHRONOUS,
- .acpi_match_table = ACPI_PTR(i2c_hid_acpi_match),
+ .acpi_match_table = i2c_hid_acpi_match,
},
.probe = i2c_hid_acpi_probe,
--
2.30.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists