[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e76cf929-ba52-6d53-9ac8-ef403f9b1f4f@huawei.com>
Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2021 09:03:53 +0800
From: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com>
To: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>, <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
<atishp@...shpatra.org>
CC: <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>, Palmer Dabbelt <palmerdabbelt@...gle.com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
<linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>, <kernel-team@...roid.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] RISC-V: Make NUMA depend on SMP
On 2021/2/27 4:25, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
> From: Palmer Dabbelt <palmerdabbelt@...gle.com>
>
> In theory these are orthogonal, but in practice all NUMA systems are
> SMP. NUMA && !SMP doesn't build, everyone else is coupling them, and I
> don't really see any value in supporting that configuration.
>
> Fixes: 4f0e8eef772e ("riscv: Add numa support for riscv64 platform")
> Suggested-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
> Suggested-by: Atish Patra <atishp@...shpatra.org>
> Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmerdabbelt@...gle.com>
Reported-and-Tested-by: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com>
> ---
> This is on fixes.
> ---
> arch/riscv/Kconfig | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/Kconfig b/arch/riscv/Kconfig
> index a998babc1237..85d626b8ce5e 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/riscv/Kconfig
> @@ -314,6 +314,7 @@ endchoice
> # Common NUMA Features
> config NUMA
> bool "NUMA Memory Allocation and Scheduler Support"
> + depends on SMP
> select GENERIC_ARCH_NUMA
> select OF_NUMA
> select ARCH_SUPPORTS_NUMA_BALANCING
Powered by blists - more mailing lists