[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <mhng-9b0ca6d2-c491-4bd8-a9c8-0b2793694576@penguin>
Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2021 19:07:25 -0800 (PST)
From: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>
To: wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com
CC: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, atishp@...shpatra.org,
aou@...s.berkeley.edu, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, kernel-team@...roid.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] RISC-V: Make NUMA depend on SMP
On Fri, 26 Feb 2021 17:03:53 PST (-0800), wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com wrote:
>
> On 2021/2/27 4:25, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
>> From: Palmer Dabbelt <palmerdabbelt@...gle.com>
>>
>> In theory these are orthogonal, but in practice all NUMA systems are
>> SMP. NUMA && !SMP doesn't build, everyone else is coupling them, and I
>> don't really see any value in supporting that configuration.
>>
>> Fixes: 4f0e8eef772e ("riscv: Add numa support for riscv64 platform")
>> Suggested-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
>> Suggested-by: Atish Patra <atishp@...shpatra.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmerdabbelt@...gle.com>
>
> Reported-and-Tested-by: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com>
Ah, thanks, I forged I'd said no to this earlier ;)
>
>
>> ---
>> This is on fixes.
>> ---
>> arch/riscv/Kconfig | 1 +
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/riscv/Kconfig b/arch/riscv/Kconfig
>> index a998babc1237..85d626b8ce5e 100644
>> --- a/arch/riscv/Kconfig
>> +++ b/arch/riscv/Kconfig
>> @@ -314,6 +314,7 @@ endchoice
>> # Common NUMA Features
>> config NUMA
>> bool "NUMA Memory Allocation and Scheduler Support"
>> + depends on SMP
>> select GENERIC_ARCH_NUMA
>> select OF_NUMA
>> select ARCH_SUPPORTS_NUMA_BALANCING
Powered by blists - more mailing lists