lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sun, 28 Feb 2021 17:32:30 +0800 From: Dinghao Liu <dinghao.liu@....edu.cn> To: dinghao.liu@....edu.cn, kjlu@....edu Cc: Peter Huewe <peterhuewe@....de>, Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org>, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>, linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH] tpm: Add missing check in tpm_inf_recv The use of wait() in tpm_inf_recv() is almost the same. It's odd that we only check the return value and terminate execution flow of one call. Signed-off-by: Dinghao Liu <dinghao.liu@....edu.cn> --- drivers/char/tpm/tpm_infineon.c | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_infineon.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_infineon.c index 9c924a1440a9..abe00f45aa45 100644 --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_infineon.c +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_infineon.c @@ -263,7 +263,9 @@ static int tpm_inf_recv(struct tpm_chip *chip, u8 * buf, size_t count) size = ((buf[2] << 8) | buf[3]); for (i = 0; i < size; i++) { - wait(chip, STAT_RDA); + ret = wait(chip, STAT_RDA); + if (ret) + return -EIO; buf[i] = tpm_data_in(RDFIFO); } -- 2.17.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists