linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/3] mfd: gateworks-gsc: Constify static struct attribute

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20210301095645.GG641347@dell>
Date:   Mon, 1 Mar 2021 09:56:45 +0000
From:   Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To:     Rikard Falkeborn <rikard.falkeborn@...il.com>
Cc:     Robert Jones <rjones@...eworks.com>,
        Tim Harvey <tharvey@...eworks.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] mfd: gateworks-gsc: Constify static struct
 attribute_group

On Sun, 31 Jan 2021, Rikard Falkeborn wrote:

> The only usage of attr_group is to pass its address to
> sysfs_create_group() and sysfs_remove_group(), both which takes pointers
> to const attribute_group structs. Make it const to allow the compiler to
> put it in read-only memory.
> 
> Done with the help of coccinelle.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rikard Falkeborn <rikard.falkeborn@...il.com>
> ---
>  drivers/mfd/gateworks-gsc.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

These patches do not seem to be on LKML.

Do you know if they were rejected for some reason?

-- 
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Senior Technical Lead - Developer Services
Linaro.org │ Open source software for Arm SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog