linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/3] mfd: gateworks-gsc: Constify static struct attribute

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 1 Mar 2021 22:11:53 +0100
From:   Rikard Falkeborn <rikard.falkeborn@...il.com>
To:     Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Cc:     Rikard Falkeborn <rikard.falkeborn@...il.com>,
        Robert Jones <rjones@...eworks.com>,
        Tim Harvey <tharvey@...eworks.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] mfd: gateworks-gsc: Constify static struct
 attribute_group

On Mon, Mar 01, 2021 at 09:56:45AM +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Sun, 31 Jan 2021, Rikard Falkeborn wrote:
> 
> > The only usage of attr_group is to pass its address to
> > sysfs_create_group() and sysfs_remove_group(), both which takes pointers
> > to const attribute_group structs. Make it const to allow the compiler to
> > put it in read-only memory.
> > 
> > Done with the help of coccinelle.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Rikard Falkeborn <rikard.falkeborn@...il.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/mfd/gateworks-gsc.c | 2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> These patches do not seem to be on LKML.
> 
> Do you know if they were rejected for some reason?
> 

I did not recieve any bounce or rejection emails. I have a vague memory
that I saw someone mentioning in another mail that there was some
problems with LKML and that patches were lost, but I can't find it now,
and I'm not sure if it was around the same time as these patches were
sent.

Should I resend the series?

/Rikard