[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210302093451.GC2690909@dell>
Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2021 09:34:51 +0000
From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To: Rikard Falkeborn <rikard.falkeborn@...il.com>
Cc: Robert Jones <rjones@...eworks.com>,
Tim Harvey <tharvey@...eworks.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] mfd: gateworks-gsc: Constify static struct
attribute_group
On Mon, 01 Mar 2021, Rikard Falkeborn wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 01, 2021 at 09:56:45AM +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
> > On Sun, 31 Jan 2021, Rikard Falkeborn wrote:
> >
> > > The only usage of attr_group is to pass its address to
> > > sysfs_create_group() and sysfs_remove_group(), both which takes pointers
> > > to const attribute_group structs. Make it const to allow the compiler to
> > > put it in read-only memory.
> > >
> > > Done with the help of coccinelle.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Rikard Falkeborn <rikard.falkeborn@...il.com>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/mfd/gateworks-gsc.c | 2 +-
> > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > These patches do not seem to be on LKML.
> >
> > Do you know if they were rejected for some reason?
> >
>
> I did not recieve any bounce or rejection emails. I have a vague memory
> that I saw someone mentioning in another mail that there was some
> problems with LKML and that patches were lost, but I can't find it now,
> and I'm not sure if it was around the same time as these patches were
> sent.
>
> Should I resend the series?
Please submit a [RESEND].
If it fails again, I'll apply the patches manually.
--
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Senior Technical Lead - Developer Services
Linaro.org │ Open source software for Arm SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists