linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] qcom: spmi-regulator: Add support for ULT LV

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 1 Mar 2021 15:27:05 +0100
From:   Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...ainline.org>
To:     Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc:     phone-devel@...r.kernel.org, ~postmarketos/upstreaming@...ts.sr.ht,
        martin.botka@...ainline.org,
        angelogioacchino.delregno@...ainline.org,
        marijn.suijten@...ainline.org, Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] qcom: spmi-regulator: Add support for ULT LV_P50 and ULT
 P300


On 01.03.2021 15:23, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 25, 2021 at 10:35:13PM +0100, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>> From: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...ainline.org>
>>
>> The ULT LV_P50 shares the same configuration as the other ULT LV_Pxxx
>> and the ULT P300 shares the same as the other ULT Pxxx.
> Please submit patches using subject lines reflecting the style for the
> subsystem, this makes it easier for people to identify relevant patches.
> Look at what existing commits in the area you're changing are doing and
> make sure your subject lines visually resemble what they're doing.
> There's no need to resubmit to fix this alone.

Yeah, sorry for that.. We've had these changes for a veery long time and it now the fact that the commit title was sub-optimal went under our radar.. Hopefully won't happen again!


Konrad